A jury deciding the fate of a former soldier accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend in a brutal stabbing attack has retired.
A jury deciding the fate of a former soldier accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend in a brutal stabbing attack has retired.

Jury retires to decide accused woman killer's fate

A jury deciding the fate of a former soldier accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend in a brutal stabbing attack has retired.

The group of eight men and four women spent the past six days in the Townsville Supreme Court hearing evidence in the case against Dane Andrew Pilcher.

Dane Andrew Pilcher allegedly murdered his ex-partner Corinne Henderson in her Idalia apartment in September 2015.
Dane Andrew Pilcher allegedly murdered his ex-partner Corinne Henderson in her Idalia apartment in September 2015.

Pilcher has admitted he is guilty to manslaughter after he smashed a glass window and broke into Corinne Henderson's third-floor apartment on Oonoonba Rd and killing her just before 11pm on September 26, 2015 after he was sent a picture of her and her new boyfriend.

The prosecution alleges that Pilcher murdered Corinne and intended to kill her, or seriously injure her, when he arrived at the gated complex that night.

Pilcher's defence barrister James Godbolt has argued that his client acted in the heat of the moment and killed Corinne after she approached and stabbed him with a knife.

The jury will have to decide if Pilcher is guilty of murder or the lesser charge of manslaughter.

If the group decides he is guilty of murdering Corinne, it will have to determine if her actions "provoked" him to kill Justice David North said.

Corinne Henderson.
Corinne Henderson.

Justice North said the partial defence was one of the "very rare circumstance" in Queensland's criminal code that relied on the defendant to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that they were provoked and lost their self-control.

"Our law recognises that a person may be killed in circumstances where the defendant was so provoked by something done by that person as to lose se the power of self control such that this provides an explanation for his or her actions which should be taken into account," Justice North said.

In normal circumstances the prosecution team bears the onus of proof.

 

Originally published as Jury retires to decide Pilcher's fate



Mayor Williams: We aren’t ‘anti-coal’

Premium Content Mayor Williams: We aren’t ‘anti-coal’

Council will welcome CQ Coal for a presentation on the St Lawrence mine project

OPINION: Perfect storm looming for state’s most vulnerable

Premium Content OPINION: Perfect storm looming for state’s most vulnerable

Harry Bruce’s cartoon of the day and readers have their say on current events.

New approval paves the way for future development at Rocky Railyards

Premium Content New approval paves the way for future development at Rocky...

The Aurizon site has been closed since 2018 but there are talks about the State...